Music and of the musician

 

NC: Parallel to the step of the artist, there is a step of man in all that made you.

AB: I.e., over-sensitiveness, as one calls that now, it is a thing very very beautiful, it is the talent, at the same time, if one wants, without being rethoric, it is also the small cross which the artists carry.

NC: And there is sense, with all that?

AB: Listen, I do not know. It is so much, I say to you, the experiment jouerde to create notes one after the other, it is so beautiful, but in the really childish direction, it is so full with pleasure... that is worth the sorrow.

NC: It is that that, that the pleasure?

AB: Yes, for me yes.

NC:Et however, there is communication, with the others. There is a message. You said, I believe, " the notes are blades which one throws "...

AB: Yes, yes, but if one speaks again of the former musician, magician " blah ", it is not a social aspect. Ca comes, but that comes all alone afterwards. I.e., if you eat the stone just at this time there, you express yourself with a language that perhaps at this time there, and not front or after, people will include/understand.

NC: It is the chance?

AB: Sometimes you arrive too early, and sometimes you arrive too late. When you are synchronous " CAP ", then what you do becomes part of the popular inheritance.

NC: Then you, synchronism?

AB: It was, it was not.

NC: And when it was it, and it is it nevertheless, it is almost universal? Because you are an international artist.

AB: Boh, I am a European artist.

NC: What is already not badly. What is already rare.

AB: Oh, I am content, but finally yes, obviously. You see, you listenings something or you see a painting, and you say " oh shit, it was that, ah oui".Tu see it is that, it is that success.

NC: You consider, you, that the song it is an art like painting or the music, with a M capital letter?

AB: Yes, if it is done way that I said to you, yes. **time-out** if it be, ce which I hate not, but if it be do of different way, and well... boh it be also a manner to earn its living, obviously but... I go not make the missionnaire, thing all that, me I hate the réthorique, normally I be much more ironic than - this afternoon I know not, it be perhaps that it there have not some sun - but it be that. It is so simple.

-

With listening to it, one could think that the artist, the musician is a species of angel, of divine emanation, but it is without taking into account humour, the irony and the clearness of the man.

-

AB: When I was small, to the academy, my professor, who was a large pedagogue, said " my small, the talent, without the character, Ca is not used for nothing. Then you must have, at the beginning especially, you must have the force to know that you are best world. Even if it is not true. "

NC: Then thus, that also it is a work?

AB:Ca it is not a work, that it is a side... Then then one said...

NC: What, to release its doubts?

AB: The musician was described as if it were a saint. Then there should well be said other thing too. It is obviously narcissistic, an egocentric person, it is shown because it is beautiful, that it wants, it wants that. It should it well be said because differently, one makes me pope tomorrow, I want to say. Then there is all that. It is a mixture of devil and angel. They is the two things at the same time.

NC: Why, because to be narcissistic and egocentric person at the same time, it is to be the " devil "?

AB: Not, but I want to say, one does not speak only with the gods, one also speaks with the daemons. The music is also that, therefore. Semi wolf and half lamb.

NC: Then, how one makes, to impose itself in the show-bizz? Concessions are made? One...

AB: Not, me I ever made some, not because I am well or moralist. Not, because the pleasure makes you do that and not another thing

NC: But when you recorded your first disc, that was not nevertheless very easy? I read some share which you were with two fingers to leave for Australia...